Unflattering
misogyny often reveals itself whenever a female uses a controversial word: “no.”
The more I
live my life, especially in the recovery context, the more I encounter a
hostile reaction whenever I give this response.
An attitude frequently
surfaces, one which asserts my “no” needs to be challenged until I agree with
the male perspective and say “yes.”
“No means no.”
We hear that
phrase a lot, especially when it comes to rape.
But the “no challenge”
can also apply as a female navigates through other issues, like her recovery from
both addiction and abuse experiences.
Indeed, in this context, my “no” has been
repeatedly disregarded; most of the time, it has come from male family members,
friends and from those I have seen socially. It’s been rejected, confronted or
questioned. And so, I next have had to firmly state, “No is a complete sentence.”
But, still, concerning even that direct
response, I have gotten further dismissed and coerced. The individual male in
each situation, attempts to sell his persuasion, charm or agenda as the reason
why I should change my “silly no” to his “right” yes. When that doesn’t happen
according to his liking, when my “no” is still the unchanged response, things
become more hostile. Name calling, emotional/physical intimidation and threats often
come next.
My
experiences are not unusual. Other females have similar encounters whenever they
have given their “no” to a boy or a man regarding any subject. Some have been
called horrible names. Some have been beaten or raped. All have, in some way,
felt invalidated and violated, simply because they dared to respond in an
unpleasing manner.
This is disturbing as it questions any
female’s response which does not agree with a male who wants something else from her.
Years ago, a
self- defense expert, instructing women on how to protect themselves against their
attackers, stated two things which changed my life:
“When a man says no, it’s the end of
the discussion. But when a woman says
no, it starts the process of negotiation.”
“When a person does not accept your
‘no,’ they’re trying to control you.”
Anyone who
struggles with addiction or abuse/ trauma experiences knows it is painfully
difficult to live a healthier life, one which results from making better choices
in his/her recovery.
Unfortunately,
concerning females, there can also be the additional complication of a male’s response
to the facilitation of these positive decisions. This reality comes into view
whenever a female’s choice butts heads with a male desire for control, power or
domination.
I have had
to repeatedly...
...state
how, no, I did not want alcohol or
drugs when it was clear my date wanted me to take them so I could be more sexually
pliable.
...state
how, no, I did not want to engage in
a behavior which, not only went against my conscience and morals, but also was
triggering to disordered image, eating and abuse experiences. That has included
a male’s pressuring insistence I diet and lose a drastic amount of weight.
...state how, no, I would not change my decision concerning
a family matter, to which I received an abusive verbal tirade from disagreeing
male family members.
Not every
male responds this way. Still, the frequency with which a female experiences this
negative response appears to be the acceptable norm.
Ralph Waldo Emerson once quoted...
“Sow a
thought and you reap an action; sow an act and you reap a habit; sow a habit
and you reap a character; sow a character and you reap a destiny.”
Whether we know it or not, intend it or
not, aren’t we, as individuals and as a culture, teaching the challenge
response to a female’s no? It can often assert principles like...
A female is inferior, incapable of knowing what
is best for herself. This includes her body, her health and her well-being.
A female’s “no” is her gender’s way of
begging to have her decision changed. Therefore, do what is necessary until she
relents with a “yes” response.
A female’s “no” is never as important,
valid or necessary as that of a man’s. Never accept this response the first
time you hear it. Always question and try to change it.
A female doesn’t possess the right to
hold a perspective which is not pleasing to others, especially when it involves
a male’s pleasure. A female is to be acquiescing and accommodating, never
disagreeable.
“Simply let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your
'No,' 'No'; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.”
Matthew
5:37
Why should there be any discrepancy when it comes to the “no” response?
If any acceptable attitude condoning an inequity of
human value thrives, based on gender, then what
are we living?
Perhaps, the negative reaction has more to do with
ignorance than it does malice. But, education- or miseducation- is no small
matter. We do learn what we live.
Regardless of gender, “No is a complete sentence.”
Copyright © 2019 by
Sheryle Cruse
No comments:
Post a Comment